Artus, M, Croft, P and Lewis, M (2007) The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain. BMC Family Practice, 8. 26 -?.

[img]
Preview
Text
The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain..pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (497kB) | Preview

Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is the single most cited reason for use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Primary care is the most frequent conventional medical service used by patients with pain in the UK. We are unaware, however, of a direct evidence of the extent of CAM use by primary care patients, and how successful they perceive it to be.

Methods Aims and objectives
To determine CAM use among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who have consulted about their pain in primary care.

Study design
Face-to-face interview-based survey.

Setting
Three general practices in North Staffordshire.

Participants
Respondents to a population pain survey who had reported having musculoskeletal pain in the survey and who had consulted about their pain in primary care in the previous 12 months as well as consenting to further research and agreeing to an interview. Information was gathered about their pain and the use of all treatments for pain, including CAM, in the previous year.

Results
138 interviews were completed. 116 participants (84%) had used at least one CAM treatment for pain in the previous year. 65% were current users of CAM. The ratio of over-the-counter CAM use to care from a CAM provider was 3:2. 111 participants (80%) had used conventional treatment. 95 (69%) were using a combination of CAM and conventional treatment. Glucosamine and fish oil were the most commonly used CAM treatments (38%, 35% respectively). Most CAM treatments were scored on average as being helpful, and users indicated that they intended to use again 87% of the CAM treatments they had already used.

Conclusion
We provide direct evidence that most primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain have used CAM in the previous year, usually in combination with conventional treatments. The high prevalence and wide range of users experiences of benefit and harm from CAM strengthen the argument for more research into this type of medicine to quantify benefit and assess safety. The observation that most users of conventional medicine also used CAM suggests a continuing need for more investigation of effective pain management in primary care.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via BioMed Central at http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-26 - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Uncontrolled Keywords: conventional treatment, musculoskeletal pain, primary care patient, chronic musculoskeletal pain, pain sufferer
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Primary Care Health Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2014 15:43
Last Modified: 17 Dec 2018 16:11
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/117

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item