Baiasu, S (2016) Is Kant’s Metaphysics Profoundly Unsatisfactory?: Critical Discussion of A. W. Moore’s Critique of Kant. Kantian Review, 21 (3). 465 -481.

[img]
Preview
Text
BaiasuOnMooreCopyeditedByRARevSB.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (115kB) | Preview

Abstract

In his recent book, The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics, Adrian W. Moore takes Kant to play a crucial role in the evolution of modern philosophy; yet, for him, Kant’s metaphysics is ultimately and profoundly unsatisfactory. In this article, I examine several of Moore’s objections and provide replies. My claim is that Moore’s reading points to fundamental issues, yet these are not issues of Kant’s transcendental idealism, but of the traditional idealism his view has often been taken to represent.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Cambridge University Press, This is an accepted manuscript of a paper published in Kantian Review, and available from https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415416000194
Uncontrolled Keywords: Kant, metaphysics, A. W. Moore, synthetic a priori, transcendental idealism, self-stultification
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Politics, Philosophy, International Relations and Environment
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 22 Sep 2016 09:25
Last Modified: 08 Apr 2019 09:05
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/2219

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item