Sharpe, A (2017) Queering Judgment: The Case of Gender Identity Fraud. Journal of Criminal Law, 81 (5). pp. 417-435.

[img] Text
Queering Judgment - Alex Sharpe updated 24 April 2017.docx - Accepted Version

Download (41kB)

Abstract

This article is a response to a series of recent successful sexual offence prosecutions brought against transgender and other gender non-conforming people for gender identity fraud, and specifically to Leveson LJ’s judgment in the Court of Appeal decision of R v McNally. The decision is now the leading authority on sexual fraud generally, and gender identity fraud specifically, under English law. The response will take the form of an academic judgment, in this instance a dissenting or counter-judgment. The article will (i) present the facts of the case, (ii) provide some detail regarding the developing jurisprudence of the courts regarding sexual fraud, (iii) preface the counter-judgment with an explanation of why an exercise in academic judgement-writing is valuable, (iv) consider a queer approach to law, and detail some queer principles around which the counter-judgment will be organised and (v) present the counter-judgment, highlighting not only that McNally could have been decided differently, but that it ought to have been decided differently.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ª The Author(s) 2017
Uncontrolled Keywords: consent; fraud; harm; judgement-writing; queer; transgender
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare > HV1449 Gay men. Lesbians
K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2017 12:22
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2019 09:36
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/3658

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item