Walsh, Aileen (2012) 'Futile' orders and morally distressed nurses: professionally sanctioned conscientious objection is not the solution. Doctoral thesis, Keele University.

[img]
Preview
Text
WalshDMedEth2012.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

There are differing views on the exact nature of moral distress in nursing, but essentially, most empirical work indicates that it is the nurse’s inability to do the right thing because she feels impeded from doing so, due to constraints such as organisational structures or lack of authority in medical decision making.
This thesis will begin with a philosophical analysis of the meaning of moral distress. It will be argued that it is a poorly defined concept but that even so, the emotional and rational challenges that it brings to the nurse, are valid and worthy of more exploration.
It will be argued that moral distress is more or less synonymous with ‘troubled conscience’.
Thereafter Catlin et al’s (2008) claim that the nursing profession ought to sanction conscientious objection to
doctors’ orders when nurses are morally distressed by perceived futile care will be examined.
I will oppose this position, and argue that instead, nurses can limit their sense of responsibility for actions performed on the behalf of doctors.
To defend my position will require the construction of
arguments based on current legal and professional practice and philosophical concepts such as erroneous
conscience, moral luck and the ethics of care.
In seeking to defend my alternate view of how the nursing profession ought to behave under such circumstances, I
will propose a new resolution to moral distress.
This will involve ethical reasoning that includes
consequetialist justifications within the paradigm of the
ethics of care.
It will also involve addressing the emotional and spiritual challenges of nursing care, which I will argue have so far not been recognised as significant components
of moral distress.
Catlin A, Volat D, Hadley M., Bassir R., Armigo C., Valle
E., Gong W. and Anderson K. (2008) Conscientious Objection: A Potential Neonatal Nursing Response to Care
Orders That Cause Suffering at the End of Life? Study of a Concept. Research in Nursing 27 (2) p. 101 – 108.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Politics, Philosophy, International Relations and Environment
Depositing User: Lisa Bailey
Date Deposited: 27 Jul 2017 10:35
Last Modified: 27 Jul 2017 10:35
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/3848

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item