Rogozińska, E and Marlin, N and Jackson, L and Rayanagoudar, G and Ruifrok, AE and Dodds, J and Molyneaux, E and van Poppel, MN and Poston, L and Vinter, CA and McAuliffe, F and Dodd, JM and Owens, J and Barakat, R and Perales, M and Cecatti, JG and Surita, F and Yeo, S and Bogaerts, A and Devlieger, R and Teede, H and Harrison, C and Haakstad, L and Shen, GX and Shub, A and Beltagy, NE and Motahari, N and Khoury, J and Tonstad, S and Luoto, R and Kinnunen, TI and Guelfi, K and Facchinetti, F and Petrella, E and Phelan, S and Scudeller, TT and Rauh, K and Hauner, H and Renault, K and de Groot, CJ and Sagedal, LR and Vistad, I and Stafne, SN and Mørkved, S and Salvesen, KÅ and Jensen, DM and Vitolo, M and Astrup, A and Geiker, NR and Kerry, S and Barton, P and Roberts, T and Riley, RD and Coomarasamy, A and Mol, BW and Khan, KS and Thangaratinam, S (2017) Effects of antenatal diet and physical activity on maternal and fetal outcomes: individual patient data meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 21 (41). 1 -158. ISSN 1366-5278

[img]
Preview
Text
riley_nihr_3010792.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diet- and physical activity-based interventions in pregnancy have the potential to alter maternal and child outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether or not the effects of diet and lifestyle interventions vary in subgroups of women, based on maternal body mass index (BMI), age, parity, Caucasian ethnicity and underlying medical condition(s), by undertaking an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. We also evaluated the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) with adverse pregnancy outcomes and assessed the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment database were searched from October 2013 to March 2015 (to update a previous search). REVIEW METHODS: Researchers from the International Weight Management in Pregnancy Collaborative Network shared the primary data. For each intervention type and outcome, we performed a two-step IPD random-effects meta-analysis, for all women (except underweight) combined and for each subgroup of interest, to obtain summary estimates of effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and synthesised the differences in effects between subgroups. In the first stage, we fitted a linear regression adjusted for baseline (for continuous outcomes) or a logistic regression model (for binary outcomes) in each study separately; estimates were combined across studies using random-effects meta-analysis models. We quantified the relationship between weight gain and complications, and undertook a decision-analytic model-based economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS: Diet and lifestyle interventions reduced GWG by an average of 0.70 kg (95% CI -0.92 to -0.48 kg; 33 studies, 9320 women). The effects on composite maternal outcome [summary odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.03; 24 studies, 8852 women] and composite fetal/neonatal outcome (summary OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; 18 studies, 7981 women) were not significant. The effect did not vary with baseline BMI, age, ethnicity, parity or underlying medical conditions for GWG, and composite maternal and fetal outcomes. Lifestyle interventions reduce Caesarean sections (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99), but not other individual maternal outcomes such as gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.10), pre-eclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16) and preterm birth (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13). There was no significant effect on fetal outcomes. The interventions were not cost-effective. GWG, including adherence to the Institute of Medicine-recommended targets, was not associated with a reduction in complications. Predictors of GWG were maternal age (summary estimate -0.10 kg, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.06 kg) and multiparity (summary estimate -0.73 kg, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.23 kg). LIMITATIONS: The findings were limited by the lack of standardisation in the components of intervention, residual heterogeneity in effects across studies for most analyses and the unavailability of IPD in some studies. CONCLUSION: Diet and lifestyle interventions in pregnancy are clinically effective in reducing GWG irrespective of risk factors, with no effects on composite maternal and fetal outcomes. FUTURE WORK: The differential effects of lifestyle interventions on individual pregnancy outcomes need evaluation. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003804. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via NIHR at https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta21410#/abstract - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017 - deposited according to publisher policies.
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Primary Care Health Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 22 Aug 2017 14:05
Last Modified: 22 Aug 2017 14:08
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/3927

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item