Budgen, D and Brereton, OP and Williams, N and Drummond, S (2017) The contributions the empirical studies performed in industry make to the findings of systematic reviews: a tertiary study. Information and Software Technology. ISSN 0950-5849

[img] Text
industry-emp-studies.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 23 October 2018.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (210kB)

Abstract

Context:
Systematic reviews can provide useful knowledge for software engineering practice, by aggregating and synthesising empirical studies related to a specific topic.
Objective:
We sought to assess how far the findings of systematic reviews addressing practice-oriented topics have been derived from empirical studies that were performed in industry or that used industry data.
Method:
We drew upon and augmented the data obtained from a tertiary study that performed a systematic review of systematic reviews published in the period up to the end of 2015, seeking to identify those with findings that are relevant for teaching and practice. For the supplementary analysis reported here, we then examined the profiles of the primary studies as reported in each systematic review.
Results:
We identified 48 systematic reviews as candidates for further analysis. The many differences that arise between systematic reviews, together with the incompleteness of reporting for these, mean that our counts should be treated as indicative rather than definitive. However, even when allowing for problems of classification, the findings from the majority of these systematic reviews were predominantly derived from using primary studies conducted in industry. There was also an emphasis upon the use of case studies, and a number of the systematic reviews also made some use of weaker ‘experience’ or even ‘opinion’ papers.
Conclusions:
Primary studies from industry play an important role as inputs to systematic reviews. Using more rigorous industry-based primary studies can give greater authority to the findings of the systematic reviews, and should help with the creation of a corpus of sound empirical data to support evidence-informed decisions.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at [insert hyperlink]. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Systematic review, primary study, industry study, case study, information systems, computer science
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Divisions: Faculty of Natural Sciences > School of Computing and Maths
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 01 Nov 2017 16:49
Last Modified: 01 Nov 2017 16:56
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/4150

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item