Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Surgery for Tennis Elbow: a Systematic Review

Surgery for Tennis Elbow: a Systematic Review Thumbnail


Abstract

Background
There is no consensus on the most suitable treatment for tennis elbow but, in the USA, surgical intervention is increasing despite a lack of supportive research evidence. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a balanced update based on all relevant published randomized controlled trials conducted to date.

Methods
An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BNI, AMED, PsycINFO, HBE, HMIC, PubMed, TRIP, Dynamed Plus and The Cochrane Library was complemented by hand searching. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and data were synthesized narratively, based on levels of evidence, as a result of heterogeneity.

Results
Twelve studies of poor methodological quality were included. The available data suggest that surgical interventions for tennis elbow are no more effective than nonsurgical and sham interventions. Surgical technique modifications may enhance effectiveness compared to traditional methods but have not been tested against a placebo.

Conclusions
Current research evidence suggests that surgery for tennis elbow is no more effective than nonsurgical treatment based on evidence with significant methodological limitations. Given the recalcitrant nature of tennis elbow for some patients, further research in the form of a high-quality placebo-controlled surgical trial with an additional conservative arm is required to usefully inform clinical practice.

Acceptance Date Oct 31, 2017
Publication Date Dec 11, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 28, 2024
Journal Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Print ISSN 1058-2746
Publisher Elsevier
Pages 35-44
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217745041
Keywords tennis; elbow; surgery; systematic review
Publisher URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1758573217745041

Files




Downloadable Citations