Prost, M (2018) Fragmentation et droits de l`homme: contre le droits-de-l'hommisme intégral. Revue des Droits de l'Homme, 15.

[img] Text
Droits-de-lhommisme intégral-2.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 December 2019.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (264kB)

Abstract

Does the absence of legal unity challenge the universality of human rights? Is the systematic integration of human rights in other branches of law a remedy to fragmentation? This article offers a critique of « integral human-rightism », i.e. the project that seeks to treat every social problem as a rights question and that promotes the mainstreaming of human rights as a regulating mechanism for managing legal pluralism. The article argues that, in order to preserve human rights’ revolutionary potential, rights fetishism must be avoided, instead advocating a tactical, critical and political use of human rights.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: human-rightism, liberalism, fragmentation, pluralism, critical approaches, indeterminacy, mainstreaming, root causes, false contingency, paradox, dilemma
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 09 Jan 2019 14:55
Last Modified: 29 Mar 2019 09:47
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/5639

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item