Price, MJ, Blake, H, Kenyon, S, White, IR, Jackson, D, Kirkham, JJ, Neilson, J, Deeks, JJ and Riley, R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-0735 (2019) Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta-analysis in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews with multiple binary outcomes. Research Synthesis Methods. (In Press)

[img] Text
MVMA paper- resubmitted clean.docx - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 May 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (50kB)

Abstract

Background: Multivariate meta-analysis (MVMA) jointly synthesise effects for multiple correlated outcomes. The MVMA model is potentially more difficult and time-consuming to apply than univariate models, so if its use makes little difference to parameter estimates it could be argued that it is redundant.

Methods: We assessed the applicability and impact of MVMA in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth (CPCB) systematic reviews. We applied MVMA to CPCB reviews published between 2011 to 2013 with two or more binary outcomes with at least three studies, and compared findings with results of univariate meta-analyses. Univariate random effects meta-analysis models were fitted using restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML).

Results: 80 CPCB reviews were published. MVMA could not be applied in 70 of these reviews. MVMA was not feasible in 3 of the remaining 10 reviews because the appropriate models failed to converge. Estimates from MVMA agreed with those of univariate analyses in most of the other 7 reviews. Statistical significance changed in 2 reviews: in 1 this was due to a very small change in p-value; in the other, the MVMA result for one outcome suggested previous univariate results may be vulnerable to small study effects and that the certainty of clinical conclusions needs consideration.

Conclusions: MVMA methods can be applied only in a minority of reviews of interventions in pregnancy and childbirth, and can be difficult to apply due to missing correlations or lack of convergence. Nevertheless, clinical and/or statistical conclusions from MVMA may occasionally differ from those from univariate analyses.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) will be available online via Wiley at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17592887 - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Subjects: R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Primary Care Health Sciences
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 08 May 2019 13:13
Last Modified: 08 May 2019 13:13
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6290

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item