Burke, DL ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-1151, Ensor, J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7481-0282, Snell, KIE, van der Windt, DA ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-6703 and Riley, RD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-0735 (2018) Guidance for deriving and presenting percentage study weights in meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. Research Synthesis Methods, 9 (2). 163 - 178.

[img]
Preview
Text
Guidance for deriving and presenting percentage study weights in MA of TA studies.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (801kB) | Preview

Abstract

Percentage study weights in meta-analysis reveal the contribution of each study toward the overall summary results and are especially important when some studies are considered outliers or at high risk of bias. In meta-analyses of test accuracy reviews, such as a bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity, the percentage study weights are not currently derived. Rather, the focus is on representing the precision of study estimates on receiver operating characteristic plots by scaling the points relative to the study sample size or to their standard error. In this article, we recommend that researchers should also provide the percentage study weights directly, and we propose a method to derive them based on a decomposition of Fisher information matrix. This method also generalises to a bivariate meta-regression so that percentage study weights can also be derived for estimates of study-level modifiers of test accuracy. Application is made to two meta-analyses examining test accuracy: one of ear temperature for diagnosis of fever in children and the other of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. These highlight that the percentage study weights provide important information that is otherwise hidden if the presentation only focuses on precision based on sample size or standard errors. Software code is provided for Stata, and we suggest that our proposed percentage weights should be routinely added on forest and receiver operating characteristic plots for sensitivity and specificity, to provide transparency of the contribution of each study toward the results. This has implications for the PRISMA-diagnostic test accuracy guidelines that are currently being produced.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final version of this article is available online at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jrsm.1283
Uncontrolled Keywords: bivariate meta‐analysis, diagnostic test accuracy, Fisher's information; percentage study weight
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Primary Care Health Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 20 May 2019 14:26
Last Modified: 20 May 2019 14:26
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6348

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item