Karstens, S and Joos, S and Hill, JC and Krug, K and Szecsenyi, J and Steinhäuser, J (2015) General Practitioners Views of Implementing a Stratified Treatment Approach for Low Back Pain in Germany: A Qualitative Study. PLoS One, 10 (8). e0136119 - ?. ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text
J Hill - General practitioners views of implementing a stratified treatment approach for low back pain in Germany - A qualitative study.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (245kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The STarT Back stratified primary care approach has demonstrated clinical and cost effectiveness in the UK, and is commonly used by General Practitioners (GPs). However, it remains unknown how this approach could be implemented into the German healthcare system. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the views and perceptions of German GPs in respect to using a stratified primary care for low back pain (LBP). METHODS: A 90-minute think-tank workshop was conducted with 14 male and five female GPs, during which the STarT-Back-Screening-Tool (SBST) and related research evidence was presented. This was followed by two focus groups, based on a semi-structured interview guideline to identify potential implementation barriers and opportunities. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed and coded using a content analysis approach. RESULTS: For the three deductively developed main themes, 15 subthemes emerged: (1) application of the SBST, with the following subthemes: which health profession should administer it, patients known to the GP practice, the reason for the GP consultation, scoring the tool, the tool format, and the anticipated impact on GP practice; (2) psychologically informed physiotherapy, with subthemes including: provision by a physiotherapist, anticipated impact, the skills of physiotherapists, management of patients with severe psychosocial problems, referral and remuneration; (3) the management of low-risk patients, with subthemes including: concern about the appropriate advising health professional, information and media, length of consultation, and local exercise venues. CONCLUSIONS: The attitudes of GPs towards stratified primary care for LBP indicated positive support for pilot-testing in Germany. However, there were mixed reactions to the ability of German physiotherapists to manage high-risk patients and handle their complex clinical needs. GPs also mentioned practical difficulties in providing extended advice to low-risk patients, which nevertheless could be addressed by involvement of specifically trained medical assistants.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Physiotherapy, Germany, Patients, Primary care, Finance, Lower back pain, Mental health therapies, Physicians
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Primary Care Health Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 17 Sep 2015 10:42
Last Modified: 30 Nov 2016 14:10
URI: http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/913

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item