Grodner, M, Clarke, SM, burley, S, Leslie, G and Haslam, R (2021) Combining topology and fractal dimension of fracture networks to characterise structural domains in thrusted limestones. Journal of Structural Geology, 153 (104468).

[img] Text
Grodner et al SINGLE FILE.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 October 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (3MB)

Abstract

Fractures in limestones of the Palaeocene Lockhart Formation in the hanging wall of the Himalayan Main Boundary Thrust north of Islamabad are examined, and the data analysed using a combination of topology and fractal dimension to characterise fracture patterns and relate them to structural domains. Neither technique alone allows the recognition of the structural domains. However, when considered together for all the fractures within an area, fore-thrusts, pop-ups and back-thrusts can be distinguished. The fractures are considered together, as the characteristics of the individual structural domains are characterised by the cumulative effect of all the different fractures, and in these complexly fractured rocks, the concept of fracture sets is problematic. Fore- and back-thrusts have higher fractal dimensions than pop-up structures. The highest fractal dimensions of both types of thrusts occur immediately adjacent to and decrease away from the central pop-up structure. Topologically, fore-thrust domains have fewer fractures and fracture intersections (nodes), with a longer mean fracture trace length; back-thrust domains contain more nodes (hence also more tips, lines, and branches) resulting in higher fracture densities. Pop-up structure domains are characterised by a low fracture intensity. Using the combined analysis of both the topology and fractal dimension, we show that the fracture pattern characteristics are predictable when related to the different structural settings identified within fold and thrust of the Lockhart Formation.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final version of this article and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website.
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General)
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GB Physical geography
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > QE Geology
Divisions: Faculty of Natural Sciences > School of Geography, Geology and the Environment
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2021 11:06
Last Modified: 17 Nov 2021 15:39
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/10185

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item