Peel, JK, Neves Miranda, R, Naimark, D, Woodward, G, Mamas, MA ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-8890, Madan, M and Wijeysundera, HC (2022) Financial Incentives for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Ontario, Canada: A Cost-Utility Analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. e025085 - ?.

[img]
Preview
Text
JAHA.121.025085.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (924kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis, which has become standard of care. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum cost-effective investment in TAVI care that should be made at a health system level to meet quality indicator goals. Methods and Results We performed a cost-utility analysis using probabilistic patient-level simulation of TAVI care from the Ontario, Canada, Ministry of Health perspective. Costs and health utilities were accrued over a 2-year time horizon. We created 4 hypothetical strategies that represented TAVI care meeting ≥1 quality indicator targets, (1) reduced wait times, (2) reduced hospital length of stay, (3) reduced pacemaker use, and (4) combined strategy, and compared these with current TAVI care. Per-person costs, quality-adjusted life years, and clinical outcomes were estimated by the model. Using these, incremental net monetary benefits were calculated for each strategy at different cost-effectiveness thresholds between $0 and $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year. Clinical improvements over the current practice were estimated with all comparator strategies. In Ontario, achieving quality indicator benchmarks could avoid ≈26 wait-list deaths and 200 wait-list hospitalizations annually. Compared with current TAVI care, the incremental net monetary benefit for this strategy varied from $10 765 (±$8721) and $17 221 (±$8977). This would translate to an annual investment of between ≈$14 to ≈$22 million by the Ontario Ministry of Health to incentivize these performance measures being cost-effective. Conclusions This study has quantified the modest annual investment required and substantial clinical benefit of meeting improvement goals in TAVI care.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Uncontrolled Keywords: quality improvement, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, health care costs, quality indicators
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General) > R735 Medical education. Medical schools. Research
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Medicine
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 03 May 2022 14:05
Last Modified: 03 May 2022 14:05
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/10848

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item