Paskins, Z ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-2986, Farmer, CE, Manning, F, Andersson, DA, Barlow, T, Bishop, FL, Brown, CA, Clark, A, Clark, EM, Dulake, D, Gulati, M, Jones, R, Le Maitre, CL, Loughlin, J, Mason, D, McCarron, M, Millar, NL, Pandit, H, Peat, G ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9008-0184, Richardson, SM, Salt, EJ, Taylor, EJ, Troeberg, L, Wilcox, RK, Wise, E, Wilkinson, C and Watt, FE (2022) Research priorities to reduce the impact of Musculoskeletal Disorders: a priority setting exercise using the CHRNI method. The Lancet Rheumatology. (In Press)

[img] Text
MSKDRAG Research Priorities Supp Data 29.4.22.pdf - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 August 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB)
[img] Text
VA RAG Priorities tables_29.4.22 (1).docx - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 August 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (28kB)
[img] Text
Prioritisation_MSKD_Draft_Vs 1.2 19.4.22 CLEAN (4).docx - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 August 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (94kB)
[img] Text
MSKDRAG Research Priorities Supp Data 29.4.22.pdf - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 August 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Involving research users in setting priorities for research is essential to ensure research outcomes are patient-centred and to maximise research value and impact. The Musculoskeletal (MSK) Disorders Research Advisory Group Versus Arthritis led a research priority setting exercise across MSK disorders. The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHRNI) method of setting research priorities with a range of stakeholders was utilised, involving four stages and two surveys, to: 1) gather research uncertainties; 2) consolidate these; 3) score uncertainties against importance and impact; and 4) analyse scoring, for prioritisation. 213 and 285 people responded to the first and second surveys respectively, representing clinicians, researchers and people with MSK disorders. Key priorities included developing and testing new treatments, better treatment targeting , early diagnosis, prevention and better understanding and management of pain, with an emphasis on understanding underpinning mechanisms. We present a call to action to researchers and funders to target these priorities.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final version of this article and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website.
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General) > R735 Medical education. Medical schools. Research
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC925 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Medicine
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 24 May 2022 13:51
Last Modified: 24 May 2022 13:51
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/10949

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item