Paskins, Z ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-2986, Roldan, V, Hawarden, A ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-579X, Bullock, L ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-1835, Urtecho, M, Torres, G, Morera, L, Suarez, N, Worrall, A ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-8560, Blackburn, SJ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-3126, Chapman, SR ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0326-7742, Jinks, C ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-2446 and Brito, J (2020) Quality and effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment decision aids: a systematic review and environmental scan. Osteoporosis International.

[img] Text
Z Paskins - Quality and effectiveness of osteoporosis....pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 June 2021.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Decision aids (DAs) are evidence-based tools that support shared decision-making (SDM) implementation in practice; this study aimed to identify existing osteoporosis DAs and assess their quality and efficacy; and to gain feedback from a patient advisory group on findings and implications for further research. We searched multiple bibliographic databases to identify research studies from 2000 to 2019 and undertook an environmental scan (search conducted February 2019, repeated in March 2020). A pair of reviewers, working independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, evaluated each trial’s risk of bias, and conducted DA quality assessment using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Public contributors (patients and caregivers with experience of osteoporosis and fragility fractures) participated in discussion groups to review a sample of DAs, express preferences for a new DA, and discuss plans for development of a new DA. We identified 6 studies, with high or unclear risk of bias. Across included studies, use of an osteoporosis DA was reported to result in reduced decisional conflict compared with baseline, increased SDM, and increased accuracy of patients’ perceived fracture risk compared with controls. Eleven DAs were identified, of which none met the full set of IPDAS criteria for certification for minimization of bias. Public contributors expressed preferences for encounter DAs that are individualized to patients’ own needs and risk. Using a systematic review and environmental scan, we identified 11 decision aids to inform patient decisions about osteoporosis treatment and 6 studies evaluating their effectiveness. Use of decision aids increased accuracy of risk perception and shared decision-making but the decision aids themselves fail to comprehensively meet international quality standards and patient needs, underpinning the need for new DA development.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final accepted manuscript an all relevant information regarding this article can be found at; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00198-020-05479-w#article-info
Uncontrolled Keywords: Decisions aids; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Shared decision-making; Systematic review
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC925 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology > Physical medicine. Physical therapy. Including massage, exercise, occupational therapy, hydrotherapy, phototherapy, radiotherapy, thermotherapy, electrotherapy
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Primary, Community and Social Care
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 17 Jun 2020 13:49
Last Modified: 25 Jun 2020 10:29
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/8090

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item