Swaithes, L ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-627X, Paskins, Z ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-2986, Duffy, H, Evans, N, Mallen, C ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2677-1028, Dziedzic, K ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1168-8993 and Finney, A (2021) Experience of implementing and delivering group consultations in UK general practice: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice.

[img]
Preview
Text
BJGP.2020.0856.full.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (783kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group consultations are a relatively new concept in UK primary care and are a suggested solution to current workload pressures in general practice. Little is known about the experience of implementing and delivering this approach from staff and organisational perspectives. AIM: To explore the experience of implementing and delivering group consultations in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative telephone interview study. METHOD: Topic guides explored the perspectives and experiences of general practice staff on the implementation and delivery of group consultations. Data analysis adopted principles of the Framework Method underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 8 GPs, 8 practice nurses, 1 nurse associate, 1 practice pharmacist, 1 deputy practice manager, and 1 healthcare assistant. Four themes were identified: sense making of group consultations; the work associated with initiating group consultations; the experiences of operationalising group consultations; and sustaining change. Group consultations made sense to participants as a mechanism to reduce burden on primary care, enhance multidisciplinary working, and provide patient-centred care. Implementation required strong leadership from a 'champion', and a facilitator had a pivotal role in operationalising the approach. The associated workload was often underestimated. Barriers to embedding change included achieving whole practice buy-in, competing practice priorities, and system-level flexibility. CONCLUSION: General practice clinicians enjoyed group consultations, yet significant work is required to initiate and sustain the approach. An implementation plan considering leadership, roles and responsibilities, and wider organisational support is required at the outset. Further research or evaluation is needed to measure process outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Royal College of General Practitioners at http://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0856 - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers, general practice, implementation, primary health care, semi-structured interviews, shared medical appointments
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Primary, Community and Social Care
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 23 Mar 2021 11:44
Last Modified: 23 Mar 2021 11:49
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/9280

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item