Allen, E and Prost, M (2022) Ceci n'est pas un État: The Order of Malta and the Holy See as Precedents for Deterritorialised Statehood? Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law. ISSN 2050-0386 (In Press)

There is a more recent version of this item available.
Full text not available from this repository.


Sinking island states have become allegories of the Anthropocene and a symbol of the radical violence of climate change. Various theories have been advanced supporting the continued existence of sunken islands as deterritorialised states. A common view among advocates of the deterritorialised statehood thesis is that, whilst at odds with the dominant concept of states as territorial entities, it is supported by precedent. In this article, we engage critically with this strand of argument and argue that the appeal to precedent raises important paradoxes for the continuation thesis. We seek to make clear that a landless state in the full sense of the term is a proposition for which there is, in actual fact, no precedent in international law and that some of the precedents that are cited in support of deterritorialised statehood – such as the Order of Malta and the Holy See – are precedents of non-state sovereign entities. Pursuing deterritorialised existence on the basis of those precedents would therefore involve a downgrade from state to non-state status, an outcome we show to be normatively undesirable.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final version of this accepted manuscript and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website.
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 07 Jan 2022 12:00
Last Modified: 19 Jan 2022 04:18

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item