Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Refining a primary care shared decision-making aid for lifestyle change: mixed methods study.

Heron

Refining a primary care shared decision-making aid for lifestyle change: mixed methods study. Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

BACKGROUND: The important role of primary care in promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours needs informed support. AIM: To elicit views on a 39-item shared decision-making (SDM) aid (SHARE-D) for lifestyle change and refine it to improve implementation. DESIGN & SETTING: Mixed methods study. METHOD: Health professionals, patients, and support workers, with experience of managing, or a history of, cardio- or cerebrovascular disease, were purposively recruited based on age, gender, and urban/rural location (n = 34). Participants completed a survey, rating the importance of including each item in a decision-aid, designed for use by patients with health professionals, and suggesting modifications. Semi-structured interviews (n = 30/34) were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Substantial agreement was observed on rating item inclusion. Based on survey and interview data, 9/39 items were removed; 13 were amended. Qualitative themes were: (i) core content of the decision-aid, (ii) barriers to use, (iii) motivation for lifestyle change, and (iv) primary care implementation. 'Self-reflective' questions and goal setting were viewed as essential components. The paper-based format, length, clarity, and time required were barriers to its use. Optional support considered within the aid was seen as important to motivate change. A digital version, integrated into patient record systems was regarded as critical to implementation. A revised 30-item aid was considered suitable for facilitating brief conversations and promoting patient autonomy. CONCLUSION: The SHARE-D decision aid for healthy lifestyle change appears to have good content validity and acceptability. Survey and interview data provided in-depth information to support implementation of a refined version. Further studies should examine its effectiveness.

Acceptance Date Nov 15, 2021
Publication Date Dec 1, 2021
Journal BJGP Open
Print ISSN 2398-3795
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0100
Publisher URL https://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2021/11/24/BJGPO.2021.0100/tab-article-info

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations