Sawadogo, SP, Niang, A, Wu, SL, Millogo, AA, Bonds, J, Latham, M, Dabiré, RK, Tatarsky, A, Tripet, F and Diabaté, A (2022) Comparison of entomological impacts of two methods of intervention designed to control Anopheles gambiae s.l. via swarm killing in Western Burkina Faso. Scientific Reports, 12 (1). 12397 - ?. ISSN 2045-2322

[thumbnail of Comparison of entomological impacts of two methods of intervention designed to control Anopheles gambiae s.l. via swarm kill.pdf]
Preview
Text
Comparison of entomological impacts of two methods of intervention designed to control Anopheles gambiae s.l. via swarm kill.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

Outdoor biting constitutes a major limitation of current vector control based primarily on long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying, both of which are indoor interventions. Consequently, malaria elimination will not be achieved unless additional tools are found to deal with the residual malaria transmission and the associated vector dynamics. In this study we tested a new vector control approach for rapidly crashing mosquito populations and disrupting malaria transmission in Africa. This method targets the previously neglected swarming and outdoor nocturnal behaviors of both male and female Anopheles mosquitoes. It involved accurate identification and targeted spraying of mosquito swarms to suppress adult malaria vector populations and their vectorial capacities. The impact of targeted spraying was compared to broadcast spraying and evaluated simultaneously. The effects of the two interventions were very similar, no significant differences between targeted spraying and broadcast spraying were found for effects on density, insemination or parity rate. However, targeted spraying was found to be significantly more effective than broadcast spraying at reducing the number of bites per person. As expected, each intervention had a highly significant impact upon all parameters measured, but the targeted swarm spraying required less insecticide.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Uncontrolled Keywords: biological techniques; ecology; medical research
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
Q Science > QH Natural history
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Natural Sciences > School of Life Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 18 Aug 2022 12:35
Last Modified: 18 Aug 2022 12:35
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/11283

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item