Wells, HM, Aston, EV, Bradford, B, O'Neill, M, Clayton, E and Andrews, W (2023) ‘Channel Shift’: technologically-mediated policing and procedural justice. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 25 (1). pp. 42-52. ISSN 1461-3557

[thumbnail of IJPSM FINAL ACCEPTED.docx] Text
IJPSM FINAL ACCEPTED.docx - Accepted Version

Download (81kB)
[thumbnail of 14613557221132962.pdf]
14613557221132962.pdf - Published Version

Download (612kB) | Preview


In recent years, UK police forces have introduced various technologies that alter the methods by which they interact with the public. In a parallel development, many forces have also begun to embrace the concept of procedural justice as a method through which to secure legitimacy and (in turn) public compliance and cooperation. What has not received sufficient attention, within policing or academia, is the extent to which these two trends are compatible, with procedural justice literature still predicated on an assumption that police-public ‘contacts’ or ‘encounters’ are in person. As such, the effect of technologically-mediating police/public contacts and, in turn, for ‘policing by consent’, is unknown. In this paper we focus specifically on the possible implications of the Single Online Home (SOH) (a portal through which the public can report crime, get updates on cases, give feedback, and pay fines, amongst other things, which is currently being rolled out across forces), considering ‘interactions’ between police and public where there is no physical co-presence (and which may be asynchronous in nature). Noting the unique context that is policing, we draw on the limited existing research on procedural justice encounters in technologically-mediated contexts to explore whether procedural justice theory is ‘future proof’ for a policing context increasingly reliant on such encounters. We conclude that, through empirical research, we must update our conceptual understanding of what ‘contact’ can mean, and accept that current developments may in fact be transforming relationships rather than simply facilitating existing ones.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2022. Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
J Political Science > J General legislative and executive papers
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social, Political and Global Studies
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 30 Sep 2022 09:27
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2023 13:19
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/11473

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item