Haider, N, Rothman-Ostrow, P, Osman, AY, Arruda, LB, Macfarlane-Berry, L, Elton, L, Thomason, MJ, Yeboah-Manu, D, Ansumana, R, Kapata, N, Mboera, L, Rushton, J, McHugh, TD, Heymann, DL, Zumla, A and Kock, RA (2020) COVID-19—Zoonosis or Emerging Infectious Disease? Frontiers in Public Health, 8. pp. 1-8. ISSN 2296-2565

[thumbnail of 1. 15. 2020. 6 Haider et al COVID-19_Zoonoses or EIDs_Frontiers in PH_2020.pdf]
1. 15. 2020. 6 Haider et al COVID-19_Zoonoses or EIDs_Frontiers in PH_2020.pdf - Published Version

Download (528kB) | Preview


<jats:p>The World Health Organization defines a zoonosis as any infection naturally transmissible from vertebrate animals to humans. The pandemic of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been classified as a zoonotic disease, however, no animal reservoir has yet been found, so this classification is premature. We propose that COVID-19 should instead be classified an “<jats:italic>emerging infectious disease (EID) of probable animal origin</jats:italic>.” To explore if COVID-19 infection fits our proposed re-categorization vs. the contemporary definitions of zoonoses, we reviewed current evidence of infection origin and transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 virus and described this in the context of known zoonoses, EIDs and “spill-over” events. Although the initial one hundred COVID-19 patients were presumably exposed to the virus at a seafood Market in China, and despite the fact that 33 of 585 swab samples collected from surfaces and cages in the market tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, no virus was isolated directly from animals and no animal reservoir was detected. Elsewhere, SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in animals including domesticated cats, dogs, and ferrets, as well as captive-managed mink, lions, tigers, deer, and mice confirming zooanthroponosis. Other than circumstantial evidence of zoonotic cases in mink farms in the Netherlands, no cases of natural transmission from wild or domesticated animals have been confirmed. More than 40 million human COVID-19 infections reported appear to be exclusively through human-human transmission. SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 do not meet the WHO definition of zoonoses. We suggest SARS-CoV-2 should be re-classified as an EID of probable animal origin.</jats:p>

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright © 2020 Haider, Rothman-Ostrow, Osman, Arruda, Macfarlane-Berry, Elton, Thomason, Yeboah-Manu, Ansumana, Kapata, Mboera, Rushton, McHugh, Heymann, Zumla and Kock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General) > R735 Medical education. Medical schools. Research
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 24 Oct 2022 14:42
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2022 14:42
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/11568

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item