Nehushtan, Y (2022) Lockdowns and Intergenerational Justice. In: Pandemic Response and the Cost of Lockdowns: Global Debates from Humanities and Social Sciences. Routledge, 171 - 194. ISBN 9781003259336

[thumbnail of 12_chap 12.pdf] Text
12_chap 12.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 November 2024.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (388kB)


In deciding its response to COVID-19, the UK government has made a policy decision to sacrifice both the short-term and long-term well-being of young people in the UK in order to shortly prolong the life of the elderly. The UK’s policy regarding the pandemic has discriminated against younger generations by imposing blanket regional and national lockdowns and strict social-distancing rules on the entire population, regardless of whether certain age groups were likely to be affected by COVID-19, and while ignoring the completely different impact that the policy had on different age groups’ current and future well-being.

While blanket lockdowns and strict social-distancing rules discriminated against younger generations, isolating only the elderly and vulnerable was both necessary and not discriminatory. Such a policy complies with the moral duties that are imposed by the concept of intergenerational justice and can also be justified behind a Rawlsian “veil of ignorance”. Isolating the elderly and the vulnerable, however, should have been advisory rather than compulsory.

Item Type: Book Section
Additional Information: The final version of this article and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 23 Nov 2022 09:10
Last Modified: 23 Nov 2022 09:10

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item