Swaithes, L, Paskins, Z, Quicke, JG, Stevenson, K, Fell, K and Dziedzic, KS (2022) Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study. Implementation Science Communications. ISSN 2662-2211 (In Press)

[thumbnail of MF CoP Clean.pdf] Text
MF CoP Clean.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 December 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (712kB)
[thumbnail of Supplementary material.pdf] Text
Supplementary material.pdf - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 December 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (205kB)


Background: Communities of Practice (CoPs) offer a strategy for mobilising knowledge and integrating evidence-based interventions into musculoskeletal practice, yet little is known about their practical application in this context. This study aimed to i) explore the process of knowledge mobilisation in the context of a CoP to implement evidence-based interventions in musculoskeletal care, and ii) co-develop recommendations to optimise the process of knowledge mobilisation in CoPs. Methods: A qualitative study comprising observation of a CoP and related planning meetings (n=5), and interviews with CoP stakeholders (including clinicians, lay members, managers, commissioners, academics) (n=15) was undertaken. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and interpreted considering the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services theory. Public contributors were collaboratively involved at key stages of the study. Results: Four themes were identified: Identifying and interpreting knowledge; practical implementation of a CoP; culture and relationship building; and responding to external context. Resource and infrastructure enabled the set-up, delivery and running of the CoP. Support for lay members is recommended to ensure effective participation and equity of power. CoP aims and purpose can develop iteratively, and this may enhance the ability to respond to contextual changes. Several recommendations for the practical application of CoPs are suggested to create the best environment for knowledge exchange and creation, support an equitable platform for participation, and help members to navigate and make sense of the CoP in a flexible way. Conclusion: This study identified how a CoP with diverse membership can promote partnership working at the intersection between knowledge and practice. Several important considerations for preparing for and operationalising the approach in implementation have been identified. Evaluation of the costs, effectiveness and impact of CoPs is needed to better understand the value added by the approach. More broadly, research is needed to explore the practical application of online CoPs and the role of international CoPs in optimising the uptake of innovations and best practice.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final version of this article and all relevant information related to it, including copyrights, can be found on the publisher website.
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General) > R735 Medical education. Medical schools. Research
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Medicine
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 16 Dec 2022 12:10
Last Modified: 16 Dec 2022 12:10
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/11808

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item