Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complementary and alternative medicine in asthma

Kohn, Charlotte M.; Paudyal, Priyamvada

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complementary and alternative medicine in asthma Thumbnail


Authors

Charlotte M. Kohn



Abstract

<jats:p>Asthma is a chronic, inflammatory lung disease affecting around 235 million people worldwide. Conventional medications in asthma are not curative and patients have significant concerns regarding their side-effects. Consequently, many asthma patients turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for a more holistic approach to care. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the effectiveness of CAM in the management of asthma in adults.</jats:p><jats:p>We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and Cochrane databases for randomised controlled trials published in English between 1990 and 2016 investigating the effectiveness of oral or topical CAM in asthmatic adults. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.</jats:p><jats:p>In all, 23 eligible trials were identified covering 19 different CAMs. Overall, there was limited evidence on the effectiveness of CAM in adult asthma as most CAMs were only assessed in a single trial. CAMs with multiple trials provided null or inconsistent results. Many of the trials were rated as having high risk of bias.</jats:p><jats:p>The existing evidence is insufficient to recommend any of the oral and topical CAMs in the management of asthma in adults.</jats:p>

Acceptance Date Nov 18, 2016
Publication Date Mar 31, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal European Respiratory Review
Print ISSN 0905-9180
Publisher European Respiratory Society
Pages 160092 - 160092
DOI https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0092-2016
Publisher URL https://err.ersjournals.com/content/26/143/160092

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations