Parsons, JA (2022) Improvidence, Precaution, and the Logical-Empirical Disconnect in UK Health Policy. Health Care Analysis. 1 - 20. ISSN 1065-3058

[thumbnail of Improvidence, Precaution, and the Logical-Empirical Disconnect in UK Health Policy.pdf]
Improvidence, Precaution, and the Logical-Empirical Disconnect in UK Health Policy.pdf - Published Version

Download (703kB) | Preview


The last decade has seen significant developments in UK health policy, with are largely claimed to be evidence based. However, such a characterisation ought, in many cases, to be questioned. Policies can be broadly understood as based primarily on either a logical or empirical case. In the absence of relevant empirical evidence, policymakers understandably appeal to logical cases. Once such evidence is available, however, it can inform policy and enable the logical case to be set aside. Such a linear policy process is not always the reality, and logical cases often continue to guide policy decisions in direct opposition to empirical evidence. In this paper, I discuss two recent examples of this disconnect between logical and empirical cases in UK health policy. The first-organ donation-illustrates an example of a significant policy change being made in opposition to the evidence. I refer to this as the improvidence approach. The second-abortion-provides an example of policymakers not making a change that has extensive supporting data. I refer to this using the more recognisable language of the precautionary approach. Ultimately, I argue that both the improvidence and precautionary approaches are examples of problematic public policy where policymakers provide no explicit justification for going against the evidence.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 21 Apr 2023 13:11
Last Modified: 21 Apr 2023 13:11

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item