Edwards, JJ, Khanna, M, Jordan, KP, Jordan, JL, Bedson, J and Dziedzic, KS (2013) Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74 (3). 490 - 498. ISSN 1468-2060

[thumbnail of Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.pdf]
Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (388kB) | Preview


OBJECTIVE: To identify valid and feasible quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic reference databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HMIC, PsychINFO), quality indicator repositories, subject experts. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible articles referred to adults with OA, focused on development or implementation of quality indicators, and relevant to UK primary care. An English language restriction was used. The date range for the search was January 2000 to August 2013. The majority of OA management guidance has been published within this time frame. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant studies were quality assessed using previous quality indicator methodology. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Articles were assessed through the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology filter; indicators were mapped to management guidance for OA in adults. A narrative synthesis was used to combine the indicators within themes. RESULTS: 10,853 articles were identified from the search; 32 were included in the review. Fifteen indicators were considered valid and feasible for implementation in primary care; these related to assessment non-pharmacological and pharmacological management. Another 10 indicators were considered less feasible, in various aspects of assessment and management. A small number of recommendations had no published corresponding quality indicator, such as use of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. No negative ('do not do') indicators were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: There are well-developed, feasible indicators of quality of care for OA which could be implemented in primary care. Their use would assist the audit and quality improvement for this common and frequently disabling condition.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Primary Care Health Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2016 11:32
Last Modified: 30 Aug 2018 15:20
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/1858

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item