Limitations on Personhood Arguments SUBMISSION to JME.doc
(68 Kb)
Document
Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
Abstract
Two notable limitations exist on the use of personhood arguments in establishing moral status. Firstly, although the attribution of personhood may give us sufficient reason to grant something moral status, it is not a necessary condition. Secondly, even if a person is that which has the 'highest' moral status, this does not mean that any interests of a person are justifiable grounds to kill something that has a 'lower' moral status. Additional justification is needed to overcome a basic wrongness associated with killing something possessing moral status. There are clear arguments already available in this regard in the case of a foetus that are not available in the case of a newborn infant. Hence, there is scope to consistently hold that abortion may be permissible but that after-birth abortion may not be permissible.
Acceptance Date | Jan 31, 2013 |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 1, 2013 |
Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
Print ISSN | 0306-6800 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Pages | e15 -e18 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100958 |
Keywords | health policy, issues, ethics, legal aspects |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100958 |
Files
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search