Fay, M (2017) Cousins, Genetic Diagnosis and Liability of Clinicians: Smith & Another v University of Leicester NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 817 (QB). Medical Law Review, 25 (1). pp. 672-683. ISSN 1464-3790

[thumbnail of Fay-Smith-v-Leicester.docx] Text
Fay-Smith-v-Leicester.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (57kB)


This comment analyses the recent High Court decision in Smith & Another v University of Leicester NHS Trust. In this case, the court struck out a claim brought by a patient’s second cousins regarding their failure to provide the patient with an accurate diagnosis, which would have resulted in the claimants being diagnosed with hereditary disease earlier than they in fact were. The claimants argued that the doctors’ failure to conduct the test caused harm and a duty of care was owed in respect of the patient’s relatives. The defendant conceded the issue of foreseeable harm but argued a duty was not fair, just, and reasonable when treating the patient and no other, or, alternately, if the duty was to inform then the cousins was insufficiently proximate. It is argued in this comment that the judge was correct to reject the claim but that aspects of the judgment demanded greater analysis.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via OUP at https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx032 Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 09 Jun 2017 11:30
Last Modified: 10 Jul 2019 01:30
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/3561

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item