Ekara Helfaya, AN, Whittington, M and Alawatage, C (2019) Exploring the quality of corporate environmental reporting: Surveying Preparers’ and Users’ Perceptions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32 (1). pp. 163-193. ISSN 0951-3574

[thumbnail of FINAL Peer Reviewed Version- Exploring and assessing the quality of CER 26MAY2018.pdf]
FINAL Peer Reviewed Version- Exploring and assessing the quality of CER 26MAY2018.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview


Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a multidimensional model for assessing the quality of corporate environmental reporting (CER) incorporating both preparer- and user-based views. Design/methodology/approach As opposed to frequently used researcher-chosen proxies, the authors used an online questionnaire asking preparers and users how they assess the quality of a company's environmental report. Findings The analysis of the responses of 177 users and 86 preparers shows that quantity was not perceived as the most significant element in determining quality. Besides quantity, the respondents also perceived information types, measures used, themes disclosed, adopting reporting guidelines, inclusion of assurance statement and the use of visual tools as significant dimensions/features of reporting quality. Research limitations/implications The online questionnaire has some limitations, especially in terms of researcher being absent to clarify meanings and, hence, possibilities that respondents may misinterpret the questionnaire elements. Practical implications Considering that robust, reliable measurement of reporting quality is difficult, preparers, standard setters and policy makers need multidimensional quality models that incorporate both users' perceptions of quality and preparers' pragmatic understanding of the quality delivery process. These will make the preparers informed of whether their disclosure may be falling short of users' expectations. Originality/value Amid, increasing complexity of CER, the research contributes to the growing body of literature on assessing the quality of CER by developing a less subjective, multidimensional, preparer-user-based quality model. This innovative quality model goes beyond the traditional quality models, subjective author-based quality measures. Focussing on the three dimensions of reporting quality - content, credibility and communication - it also offers a high-level resolution of meaning of CER quality.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Emerald. This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Emerald at https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2023 - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Content analysis; Environmental reporting; Reporting quality; Disclosure index; Multidimensional quality model
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting. Bookkeeping
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > Keele Management School
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 31 May 2018 15:03
Last Modified: 04 Feb 2019 12:09
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/4949

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item