Nehushtan, Y (2019) Conscientious Objection and Equality Laws: Why the Content of the Conscience Matters. Law and Philosophy, 38 (3). pp. 227-266. ISSN 0167-5249

[thumbnail of Nehushtan2019_Article_ConscientiousObjectionAndEqual.pdf]
Nehushtan2019_Article_ConscientiousObjectionAndEqual.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (330kB) | Preview


By enacting equality laws the liberal state decides the limits of liberal tolerance by relying on content-based rather than content-neutral considerations. Equality laws are not and cannot be neutral. They reflect a content-based moral decision about the importance and weight of the principle of equality vis-à-vis other rights or interests. This leads to the following conclusions: First, since equality laws in liberal democracies reflect moral-liberal values, conscientious objections to equality laws rely, almost by definition, on unjustly intolerant, anti-liberal and morally repugnant values. Secondly, we should not shy away from explicitly relying on moral-liberal views when deciding whether it is justified to grant exemptions from equality laws. Thirdly, conscientious objections to equality laws should normally not be tolerated or accommodated by the state, because conscientious objections that rely on what is rightly perceived by the legislature as unjustly intolerant, anti-liberal and morally repugnant values should not be tolerated in a tolerant-liberal democracy.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Springer at - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2018 11:32
Last Modified: 20 May 2019 08:01

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item