Keele Research Repository
Explore the Repository
Wrigley, AJ (2013) Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’. Journal of Medical Ethics. ISSN 1473-4257
![[thumbnail of Personhood After Birth Abortion JME Author Copy 2013.pdf]](https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Personhood After Birth Abortion JME Author Copy 2013.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (83kB)
Abstract
Two notable limitations exist on the use of personhood arguments in establishing moral status. Firstly, although the attribution of personhood may give us sufficient reason to grant something moral status, it is not a necessary condition. Secondly, even if a person is that which has the ‘highest’ moral status, this does not mean that any interests of a person are justifiable grounds to kill something that has a ‘lower’ moral status. Additional justification is needed to overcome a basic wrongness associated with killing something possessing moral status. There are clear arguments already available in this regard in the case of a foetus that are not available in the case of a newborn infant. Hence, there is scope to consistently hold that abortion may be permissible but that after-birth abortion may not be permissible.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | The final version of this publication is available online at https://jme.bmj.com/content/39/5/e15 |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics |
Divisions: | Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Politics, Philosophy, International Relations and Environment |
Depositing User: | Symplectic |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2019 13:20 |
Last Modified: | 01 Apr 2019 10:31 |
URI: | https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6121 |