Hässler, T, Ullrich, J, Bernardino, M, Shnabel, N, Valdenegro, D, Van Laar, C, Sebben, S, Visintin, E, Tropp, L, González, R, Abrams, D, Ditlmann, R, Selvanathan, H, von Zimmermann, J, Wright, S, Brankovic, M, Aydin, A, Pasek, M, Pereira, A, Žeželj, I, Lantos, N, Sainz, M, Glenz, A, Oberpfalzerova, H, Bilewicz, M, Kende, A, Kuzawinska, O, Otten, S, Maloku, E, Gul, P, Noor, M, Pistella, J, Baiocco, R, Jelic, M, Osin, E, Bareket, O, Biruski, D, Cook, J, Dawood, M, Droogendyk, L, Loyo, A, Kelmendi, K and Ugarte, L (2020) A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4. pp. 380-386. ISSN 2397-3374

[thumbnail of MS.docx] Text
MS.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (488kB)


Beginning with the historic racial desegregation in the United States, and spreading to other parts of the world, policy makers, guided by the findings of social scientists, have advocated for increased intergroup contact (e.g., in schools and neighborhoods) as the key to prejudice reduction and increased social cohesion. There is contradictory evidence, however, as to whether intergroup contact hinders or promotes support for social change toward equality. Using a larger and more heterogeneous dataset than ever before in the intergroup contact literature (N = 12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact is associated with increased support for social change toward greater equality among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but decreased support among members of disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification curve analysis revealed important variation in the size—and at times, direction—of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change, willingness to work in solidarity to promote social equality, that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged- and disadvantaged-group members.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Nature Research at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z - please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Uncontrolled Keywords: human behaviour, social policy
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Divisions: Faculty of Natural Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 06 Jan 2020 14:17
Last Modified: 27 Jul 2020 01:30
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/7450

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item