Keele Research Repository

Objective
To evaluate the responsiveness, and concurrent validity of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in UK primary care patients with common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain presentations.

Methods
A secondary analysis of a primary care pilot randomised trial (STarT MSK) was performed. In 524 people consulting with back, neck, shoulder, knee, or multi-site pain, the following were recorded at 0/6 months: MSK-HQ, EQ-5D-5L, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ; back pain), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Knee Injury and Outcome Score (KOOS), Short-Form-12 (SF-12; multisite pain). At 6-months, patients self-rated their global change in MSK condition, from -5 (“very much worse”) to +5 (“completely recovered”). Receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated abilities of 6-month changes in each patient reported outcome measure (PROM) to discriminate between patients improving/not improving on global change scores, with Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) calculated.

Results
The MSK-HQ had a good ability to discriminate between MSK pain patients reporting global improvement vs. no improvement (area under the curve [AUC] 0.81; 95% CI 0.78, 0.85). Its discriminative ability was higher than the EQ-5D-5L (AUC 0.68; 95% CI 0.62, 0.73) and similar to site-specific PROMs. The MCID for the 6-month change in MSK-HQ was 5.5. The MSK-HQ had strong correlations with all PROMs, except SF-12 scores.

Conclusion
In primary care patients with common MSK pain presentations, the MSK-HQ was as good as existing pain-site specific PROMs at identifying people reporting global improvements in their MSK condition, and was better than the EQ-5D-5L.