Tierney, W, Hardy, J, Ebersole, CR, Viganola, D, Clemente, EG, Gordon, M, Hoogeveen, S, Haaf, J, Dreber, A, Johannesson, M, Pfeiffer, T, Huang, JL, Vaughn, LA, DeMarree, K, Igou, ER, Chapman, H, Gantman, A, Vanaman, M, Wylie, J, Storbeck, J, Andreychik, MR, McPhetres, J, Uhlmann, EL, Forecasting Collaboration, Culture & Work Morality and Troïan, J (2021) A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93. 104060 - 104060. ISSN 0022-1031

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0022103120304005-main.pdf]
1-s2.0-S0022103120304005-main.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview


How can we maximize what is learned from a replication study? In the creative destruction approach to replication, the original hypothesis is compared not only to the null hypothesis, but also to predictions derived from multiple alternative theoretical accounts of the phenomenon. To this end, new populations and measures are included in the design in addition to the original ones, to help determine which theory best accounts for the results across multiple key outcomes and contexts. The present pre-registered empirical project compared the Implicit Puritanism account of intuitive work and sex morality to theories positing regional, religious, and social class differences; explicit rather than implicit cultural differences in values; self-expression vs. survival values as a key cultural fault line; the general moralization of work; and false positive effects. Contradicting Implicit Puritanism's core theoretical claim of a distinct American work morality, a number of targeted findings replicated across multiple comparison cultures, whereas several failed to replicate in all samples and were identified as likely false positives. No support emerged for theories predicting regional variability and specific individual-differences moderators (religious affiliation, religiosity, and education level). Overall, the results provide evidence that work is intuitively moralized across cultures.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Divisions: Faculty of Natural Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Symplectic
Date Deposited: 15 Oct 2021 11:47
Last Modified: 15 Oct 2021 11:47
URI: https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/9996

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item